"The wave" is angered by biased refereeing in the match against REO (VIDEO) © EuroFootball.com

Football spectacle is created by 25 people. The spectacle is successful when the surnames of three people remain uninteresting to anyone, because they perform their work in a way that does not interfere with others and their actions do not determine the result, as written on the official website of Gargzdai club.

Can we say the same about the people who officiated at the REO and "Bangos" match on Friday?

After the 67th minute when the Vilnius team took the lead, "Banga" sent the ball to the hosts' goal twice, but both times the match referee A. Kancleris and his assistants saw rule violations. In the 77th minute, a foul was recorded in the penalty area fighting for the ball, and in the 87th minute - an offside for A.Dos Santos who sent the ball to the goal.

We watch the match record (VIDEO) and questions arise that arose during the match itself - have we missed any section of the football rules and are now interpreting incorrectly when and how certain rule violations are recorded?

Did A.Ruškys really commit a foul against A.Lipskis in the 77th minute? And if so, should the rule violation have been recorded immediately, or wait for the ball to go into the goal after the next player's shot, and then "remember" the foul? Is it only us who see that in the 87th minute during the ball pass (at that moment the offside is recorded - isn't it?) closer to the goal of the Vilnius team, there is really REO player K.Jasatis?

Yes, "Banga" did not play well on Friday. But this is football and even playing like that, you can still have a happy end if three people do their job well. Somehow it is hard to criticize those who worked on May 11. But maybe we are wrong?